Extreme Dissensus: Explaining Plurality Decisions on the United States Supreme Court
نویسنده
چکیده
Plurality decisions on the Supreme Court represent extreme dissensus where no clear majority is formed for any one controlling rationale for the final disposition. Studying these decisions is important because they erode the Court’s credibility and authority as a source of legal leadership, and because they provide broader lessons about judicial decision making. This article presents the first systematic analysis of plurality decisions. We test three possible explanations for plurality decisions—a lack of social consensus, “hard” cases, and strategic interactions during opinion writing. We find splintering increases when the Court reviews politically salient and constitutional issues, and when there was dissensus on the lower court, while it decreases when the chief assigns the opinion and when the Court is ideologically heterogeneous.
منابع مشابه
The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right.
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide later this year whether to let stand decisions by two appeals courts permitting doctors to help terminally ill patients commit suicide. The Ninth and Second Circuit Courts of Appeals last spring held that state laws in Washington and New York that ban assistance in suicide were unconstitutional as applied to doctors and their dying patients. If the Supreme Cou...
متن کاملPress freedom in the Brazilian Supreme Court: a comparative analysis with the U.S. Supreme Court
This paper analyzes the understanding of the Brazilian Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States about press freedom. The research aims to compare the position of the Courts about this fundamental right. Using the comparative method, it analyzes the arguments used by the courts in trials which had press freedom as its object. The paper also presents a literature review of the Bra...
متن کاملU.S. Supreme Court Decisions and Sex Offender Legislation: Evidence of Evidence-Based Policy?
متن کامل
Fear and Darkness: Anti-abortion Terrorism and the United States Supreme Court
Title of Thesis: FEAR AND DARKNESS: ANTI-ABORTION TERRORISM AND THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Brad Bartholomew, Master of Arts Thesis Directed by: Professor Ray Paternoster Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Relative deprivation theory (Davies, 1962) suggests that acts of anti-abortion terrorism result from the general widening of the gap between the individual’s goals and expecta...
متن کامل